By Jacob Klein
The Meno, the most generally learn of the Platonic dialogues, is obvious afresh during this unique interpretation that explores the discussion as a theatrical presentation. simply as Socrates's listeners may have wondered and tested their very own considering in keeping with the presentation, so, Klein exhibits, may still glossy readers get entangled within the drama of the discussion. Klein bargains a line-by-line statement at the textual content of the Meno itself that animates the characters and dialog and punctiliously probes every one major flip of the argument.
Originally released in 1965.
A UNC Press Enduring version -- UNC Press Enduring variants use the newest in electronic expertise to make on hand back books from our amazing backlist that have been formerly out of print. those variants are released unaltered from the unique, and are offered in reasonable paperback codecs, bringing readers either old and cultural value.
Read or Download A Commentary on Plato's Meno PDF
Best greek & roman books
During this cutting edge research, Plato's 4 eleatic dialogues are handled as a continuing argument. In Kenneth Dorter's view, Plato reconsiders the speculation of kinds propounded in his previous dialogues and during an exam of the theory's boundaries reaffirms and proves it crucial. Contradicted are either these philosophers who argue that Plato espoused his idea of types uncritically and people who argue that Plato in a few experience rejected the idea and moved towards the specific research constructed byAristotle.
This predictable ebook betrays the author's eagerness to comply to the tutorial models of the day. Its predictable thesis is that "Pappus was once no longer working in a vacuum" (pp. 89-90); particularly he had an "agenda" (e. g. , p. 169) to "augment his status" (p. 200), and so on. , and so forth. In different phrases, the standard staple thesis of the pomo iteration of historians.
This publication, a historical past of a spiritual class of historic philosophy, is the 1st synthesis at the thought of daimn within the Platonic culture. Platonic demonology is a physique of doctrine that continually reorganized and redefined itself, from the previous Academy to the final Neoplatonists, by means of reinterpreting Platos texts pertaining to demons.
- The Socratic Method: Plato's Use of Philosophical Drama (Continuum Studies In Ancient Philosophy)
- Akrasia in Greek Philosophy (Philosophia Antiqua)
- The Socratic Turn: Knowledge of Good and Evil in an Age of Science
- Plato's Invisible Cities: Discourse and Power in the Republic
Extra info for A Commentary on Plato's Meno
He insists—four times (ou chalepon, rhaidion, ou chalepon, oak aporia eipein) —that this telling does not present any difficulty. T h e sort of thing h u m a n excellence is depends, according to his statement, on the circumstances of the person in whom it is exhibited, that is on his sex, his age, his status in the h u m a n community, on the kind of action he is engaged in, on the goal he pursues, and so on. A n d M e n o does not forget to add that lack of excellence manifests itself in equally diversified ways.
Life of Artaxerxes, 1. v. Artaxerxes. Xenophon, Anabasis I I , 6, 29, reports this only from hearsay. ingful in the context of the dialogue. i, memini, mens, mind. 3 2 W e note that in the n a m e " M e n o " the sequence of those two letters is somewhat deranged. As to the content and syntax of the second sentence, 33 w h a t seems to be common to the two subjects, " h e " and "you," is not c o m m o n to both, a n d it is the particle te which carries this ambiguity: Gorgias might well know what arete is, while M e n o m i g h t merely know what Gorgias said it is.
T h e irony is compounded by the immediately following exa m p l e given by Socrates to describe the dearth of wrisdom in Athens. Nobody, says Socrates, nobody in Athens would react to Meno's question in any other way than by asserting that, far from knowing the m a n n e r in which h u m a n excellence comes into being, he did n o t even know what, all in all, hu19. Aristophanes, Frogs 1491-99. 20. Cf. the notes by St. George Stock, The Notes pp. , and Thompson, pp. 59 f. 21. : e m γάρ δή πλάστη Friedlander, Platon I I , p.