Scientific Knowledge: Causation, Explanation, and by J.H. Fetzer

By J.H. Fetzer

With this protection of intensional realism as a philosophical starting place for realizing clinical systems and grounding clinical wisdom, James Fetzer presents a scientific replacement to a lot of contemporary paintings on medical idea. To Fetzer, the present kingdom of knowing the 'laws' of nature, or the 'law-like' statements of clinical theories, seems to be one among philosophical defeat; and he's made up our minds to beat that defeat. established upon his incisive advocacy of the single-case propensity interpretation of chance, Fetzer develops a coherent constitution during which the crucial difficulties of the philosophy of technology locate their recommendations. even if the reader accepts the author's contentions may perhaps, in spite of everything, depend on historic offerings within the interpretation of expertise and rationalization, yet there will be little question of Fetzer's lively competence in arguing for environment ontology prior to epistemology, and in the research of language. To us, Fetzer's ambition is attractive, fusing, as he says, the substantial dedication of the Popperian with the conscientious sensitivity of the Hempelian to the technical precision required for justified explication. To Fetzer, technology is the target pursuit of fallible common wisdom. This blameless personality­ ization, which we believe so much scientists might welcome, gets a so much cautious elaboration during this e-book; it is going to call for both cautious serious con­ sideration. middle for the Philosophy and ROBERT S. COHEN heritage of technology, MARX W. WARTOFSKY Boston collage October 1981 v desk OF CONTENTS EDITORIAL PREFACE v FOREWORD xi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xv half I: CAUSATION 1.

Show description

Read Online or Download Scientific Knowledge: Causation, Explanation, and Corroboration PDF

Best history & theory books

Charles Taylor (Philosophy Now Series)

Charles Taylor (b. 1931) is without doubt one of the such a lot influential and prolific philosophers within the English-speaking international. His surprisingly large pursuits diversity from synthetic intelligence to theories of that means, from German idealism to modern multiculturalism. Ruth Abbey, within the first systematic single-authored learn of this awesome philosopher, bargains a stimulating evaluation of his contribution to a few of philosophy's enduring debates.

Scientific Knowledge: Causation, Explanation, and Corroboration

With this safeguard of intensional realism as a philosophical beginning for realizing clinical systems and grounding clinical wisdom, James Fetzer offers a scientific replacement to a lot of modern paintings on clinical idea. To Fetzer, the present kingdom of figuring out the 'laws' of nature, or the 'law-like' statements of clinical theories, seems to be certainly one of philosophical defeat; and he's made up our minds to beat that defeat.

Early Childhood Education: History, Philosophy and Experience

This available creation to the heritage of early early life schooling emphasises the function of historical past and philosophy in early youth perform at the present time. Firmly grounded in present coverage from around the united kingdom, the textual content incorporates a sequence of imagined conversations with key figures and pioneers, which exemplify a variety of philosophical positions in early adolescence.

Machiavelli: The Chief Works and Others, Vol. 3

From compliment for the 1965 edition:Allan Gilbert is surely the main exact and trustworthy translator of Machiavelli into English; the book of this variation is an altogether chuffed get together. scholars of the background of political suggestion owe a specific debt of gratitude to Allan Gilbert. ”—Dante Germino, The magazine of Politics“A so much awesome success.

Extra resources for Scientific Knowledge: Causation, Explanation, and Corroboration

Example text

The shape and color of a billiard ball, the malleability and conductivity of a metal bar, and the strength and charge of an electric current, are all dispositions in this sense; consequently, this conception is intended to represent the kind of property dispositions are as features of the physical world independently of any consideration for the ease with which their presence or absence may be ascertained on the basis of experiential findings. Not all tendencies are dispositional, moreover, as means, modes, and medians frequently reflect.

Since (5) and (6) possess precisely the same syntactical and semantical significance, however, surely (5) is lawlike if and only if (6) is lawlike; so if it is an important desideratum that lawlike sentences but not accidental generalizations are to be invoked to explain their instances, then how can (5) justifiably be held to be lawlike to any greater or lesser a degree than (6)? If (6) is not a lawlike sentence, therefore, neither is (5) - on pain of contradiction. The third significant reason for rejecting extensional formulations of lawlike sentences is that their application for the purpose of formalizing definitions for dispositional predicates produces inadequate and problematic outcomes.

If, say, 89%, 95%, or 99% of the members of this ersatz community asserted this position during interviews, defended these views in their classrooms, and apparently practiced such procedures within the confines of their laboratories, would the questions under consideration thereby have been settled? Obviously not. Fortunately for the progress of science, even the endorsement of inadequate conceptions does not seem to exert an especially damaging influence upon the actual conduct of inquiry; but it is impossible to calculate the benefits that might accrue from the general acceptance of more appropriate standards.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.55 of 5 – based on 23 votes